A persona is only useful if it's specific enough that it couldn't describe anyone.
NKUHT · International Tourism Management Program · 2-hour session
Welcome back. Recap: top 2 ideas from Week 3.
The Value Proposition Canvas.
Jobs, pains, gains — and how to avoid a generic persona.
Activity: draft 2 contrasting personas.
Share, debrief, quick learning check.
You generated 8 ideas and converged on your team's top 2, using clear criteria.
Now you get specific about who this is actually for — using real evidence, not assumptions.
Two halves. If they don't connect, the value proposition doesn't hold up.
Jobs (what they're trying to do), Pains (what gets in the way), Gains (what a great outcome looks like).
Pain relievers, gain creators, and the product/service itself — must map directly to the profile.
"Wants good food and low prices." — This describes almost every student on campus.
"An exchange student who doesn't recognize menu items and worries about ordering wrong." — Specific, evidence-based, testable.
Goal: create 2 distinct personas with contrasting needs, grounded in your Week 2 interview notes.
Tip: give a 10-minute warning, then a 2-minute warning.
1. Read your two personas out loud. Could you swap the names and it still make sense?
2. Where did each pain or gain come from — a real interview note, or an assumption?
3. Which persona's value proposition feels weaker right now? Why?
1. A strong persona is one that...
2. Pains and gains in a persona should come from...
3. The Value Map should...
Next week: the Idea Marketplace — pitch your idea to recruit teammates, then sign a Co-founder Agreement.
Bring: your two personas.